Chambers v. Commonwealth

10 Ky. Op. 540, 1880 Ky. LEXIS 205
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided March 10, 1880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Hines:

The judgment of the court below was reversed upon the supposition that the plea of former acquittal had been properly entered; but [541] our attention is called to the fact that'the only record evidence of such a plea is the following order: “This day came the defendant and entered a plea of not guilty and former acquittal.” This is not sufficient, under Sec. 164 of the Criminal Code, to authorize the introduction of evidence to establish the fact of a former acquittal. A plea properly entered and sustained by evidence would entitle appellant, under the 'authority of Commonwealth v. Bright, 78 Ky. 238, to a reversal, but in the absence of a plea the evidence is incompetent and the judgment must be affirmed.

W. B. Smith, for appellant. Hardin, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. Commonwealth, 10 Ky. Op. 540, 1880 Ky. LEXIS 205 (Ky. Ct. App. 1880).

10 Ky. Op. 540 (Chambers v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Commonwealth
114 S.W.2d 757 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1938)