Chambers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

77 F.2d 95, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1347, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4506
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 29, 1935·No. 5597, 5598·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

These two appeals concern income tax in the same estate; one for the tax year of 1927, the other for 1929.

The underlying question involved is whether the gains realized in those years from the sale of certain stocks and real estate constituted corpus of the estate, and the tax was, therefore, payable by the trustees of the estate, or were gains and profits of the beneficiaries, and the tax was, therefore, payable by them. The Tax Board held the gains and profits were corpus, and the tax was, therefore, payable by the trustees.

The case turns on the construction and effect of the will of Fred N. Chambers, which created the trust. The pertinent facts are discussed at length by the Tax Board and by reference thereto we avoid needless repetition. The Board’s holding, “The petitioners have failed to show that any part of the gain here in question was from income or that it was actually distributed. They have, therefore, failed to overcome the respondent’s (the Commissioner’s) determination,” was justified, and, agreeing therewith, we limit ourselves to affirming its orders.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 77 F.2d 95, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1347, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4506 (3d Cir. 1935).

77 F.2d 95 (Chambers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunlop v. Commissioner
165 F.2d 284 (Eighth Circuit, 1948)
Burchenal v. Commissioner
150 F.2d 482 (Sixth Circuit, 1945)