Chambers Roy & Co. v. Knapp

20 So. 677, 48 La. Ann. 1156, 1896 La. LEXIS 585
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 24, 1896
DocketNo. 11,963
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 So. 677 (Chambers Roy & Co. v. Knapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chambers Roy & Co. v. Knapp, 20 So. 677, 48 La. Ann. 1156, 1896 La. LEXIS 585 (La. 1896).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

The facts are similar to those in the case of A. Lehman & Co. vs. S. A. Knapp et als., ante, p. 1148, save that the plaintiffs held notes representing defendants’ indebtedness to them. The acceptance of a note is not deemed a payment or novation unless the parties so agree.

It follows that if a corporation becomes indebted at. a time when those who organized it are in default in not properly indicating, as-the State requires, that it is a company limited, they are liable personally and are not discharged by the fact that their creditors accepted their note.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hartson, Inc. v. Brawley & Watson, Inc.
180 So. 2d 588 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)
W. W. Carre Co. v. E. J. Stewart & Co.
117 So. 238 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 So. 677, 48 La. Ann. 1156, 1896 La. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-roy-co-v-knapp-la-1896.