Chambers Roy & Co. v. Knapp

20 So. 677, 48 La. Ann. 1156, 1896 La. LEXIS 585
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 24, 1896·No. No. 11,963·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

The facts are similar to those in the case of A. Lehman & Co. vs. S. A. Knapp et als., ante, p. 1148, save that the plaintiffs held notes representing defendants’ indebtedness to them. The acceptance of a note is not deemed a payment or novation unless the parties so agree.

It follows that if a corporation becomes indebted at. a time when those who organized it are in default in not properly indicating, as-the State requires, that it is a company limited, they are liable personally and are not discharged by the fact that their creditors accepted their note.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers Roy & Co. v. Knapp, 20 So. 677, 48 La. Ann. 1156, 1896 La. LEXIS 585 (La. 1896).

20 So. 677 (Chambers Roy & Co. v. Knapp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartson, Inc. v. Brawley & Watson, Inc.
180 So. 2d 588 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)
W. W. Carre Co. v. E. J. Stewart & Co.
117 So. 238 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)