Chamberlin v. Winn

Washington Supreme Court

Chamberlin v. Winn

24 P. 446, 1 Wash. 259, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 53

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chamberlin v. Winn. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Wash. 501 →

Washington Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 1890·No. No. 546·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

Upon the re-argument of this cause, which was allowed by the territorial supreme court, a constitutional majority of this court have not become satisfied that the judgment heretofore last rendered, reversing the lower court, is wrong.

It is, therefore, allowed to stand, and a remittitur is directed.

Stiles and Hoyt, JJ., concur. Anders, C. J., and Dunbar, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

Upon the re-argument of this cause, which was allowed by the territorial supreme court, a constitutional majority of this court have not become satisfied that the judgment heretofore last rendered, reversing the lower court, is wrong.

It is, therefore, allowed to stand, and a remittitur is directed.

Stiles and Hoyt, JJ., concur. Anders, C. J., and Dunbar, J., not sitting.

Chamberlin v. Winn, 24 P. 446, 1 Wash. 259, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 53 (Wash. 1890).

Pincite

24 P. 446 (Chamberlin v. Winn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.