Chamberlin v. Slayton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Chamberlin v. Slayton

35 N.W. 754, 37 Minn. 119, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 51

DecidedJune 15, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 35 N.W. 754 (Chamberlin v. Slayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chamberlin v. Slayton, 35 N.W. 754, 37 Minn. 119, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 51 (Mich. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Mitchell, J.¹

We find no error in the rulings of the trial court in the admission of evidence, and the portions, of his charge excepted to are, as applied to the facts in this case, entirely correct, and could not have been misunderstood by the jury as meaning that they were bound to find for the plaintiff. As to the amount of the verdict, although it may seem somewhat large, yet, in our judgment, there was evidence reasonably tending to prove that plaintiff’s time and services were worth the sum allowed by the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell, J.¹

We find no error in the rulings of the trial court in the admission of evidence, and the portions, of his charge excepted to are, as applied to the facts in this case, entirely correct, and could not have been misunderstood by the jury as meaning that they were bound to find for the plaintiff. As to the amount of the verdict, although it may seem somewhat large, yet, in our judgment, there was evidence reasonably tending to prove that plaintiff’s time and services were worth the sum allowed by the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 N.W. 754, 37 Minn. 119, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chamberlin-v-slayton-minn-1887.