Chamberlin v. Fisher

Fifth Circuit

Chamberlin v. Fisher

869 F.3d 355, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12329

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 2017

DocketNo. 15-70012

StatusPublished

This text of 869 F.3d 355 (Chamberlin v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chamberlin v. Fisher, 869 F.3d 355, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12329 (5th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

869 F.3d 355, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chamberlin-v-fisher-ca5-2017.