Home/New York Supreme Court/Chamberlin v. Day

Chamberlin v. Day

3 Cow. 353
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1824
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 3 Cow. 353 (Chamberlin v. Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chamberlin v. Day, 3 Cow. 353 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

Opinion

Curia.

Wiley took the assignment subject to all the equi-. ties actually existing against Chamberlin’s judgment at the time of the assignment. Want of notice will not protect against these. Day had purchased and took an assignment pf Gold’s judgment, before Chamberlin’s was assigned ; and having a right to this set off prior to that assignment, it did not divest that right. The motion must be granted.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winterson v. Hitchings
38 N.Y.S. 171 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Cormier v. Constantine
5 N.Y.S. 177 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1889)
Terney v. Wilson
45 N.J.L. 282 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1883)
Ritter v. Cost
99 Ind. 80 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Stilwell v. Carpenter
2 Abb. N. Cas. 238 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Rowe v. Langley
49 N.H. 395 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1870)
Burtis v. Cook & Sargent
16 Iowa 194 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1864)
Hurst v. Sheets
14 Iowa 322 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1862)
Countryman v. Boyer
3 How. Pr. 386 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cow. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chamberlin-v-day-nysupct-1824.