Chamberlin v. Ball
This text of 81 Mass. 352 (Chamberlin v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To render a copy of a record of a court in this commonwealth competent evidence in another court within this state, it is not necessary that it should be an exemplified copy under the seal of the court. The rule is otherwise in many of the United States. But in Massachusetts it is sufficient if the copy is attested by the clerk. This rule of evidence is founded on immemorial usage. It was recognized in the early colonial statutes, and again in the Prov. St. of 14 G. 3, §§ 2, 3, and has been since generally acted on in practice. Anc. Chart. 182, 685. Ladd v. Blunt, 4 Mass. 402. Jenkins v. Kinsley, Coleman & Caines, 136. 1 Greenl. Ev. § 501, note.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 Mass. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chamberlin-v-ball-mass-1860.