Chamberlin & Griffith v. Lake Erie & W. R. R.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Chamberlin & Griffith v. Lake Erie & W. R. R.

63 Ill. App. 575, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 981

DecidedDecember 21, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 63 Ill. App. 575 (Chamberlin & Griffith v. Lake Erie & W. R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chamberlin & Griffith v. Lake Erie & W. R. R., 63 Ill. App. 575, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 981 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

per Curiam.

This was a motion to retax costs in an action at law.

This appeal was designed to question the correctness of the rulings and decision of the court upon the motion.'

But the bill of exceptions contains only the evidence, and therein is no allusion to any ruling, finding, or decision of ■ the court, or to any exception whatever.

In all respects the record is the same as in First Nat. Bank, etc., v. Lake Erie and Western Railroad, decided at this term.

For reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, we are here precluded from reviewing the alleged errors of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI