Chamberlain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

96 A.3d 987, 626 Pa. 254, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1731

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chamberlain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Read the opinion of the Court — 631 Pa. 489 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 16, 2014·No. No. 63 MAL 2014·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Does the Commonwealth Court’s Opinion requiring payment of UC benefits conflict with previous appellate opinions mandating denial of either UC or WC benefits to persons serving criminal sentences in less than full confinement?

[255]*255(2) Did the Commonwealth Court improperly exempt Claimant from the incarceration disqualification under the [UC] Law by erroneously applying the holdings of this Court on house arrest in other contexts?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

(1) Does the Commonwealth Court’s Opinion requiring payment of UC benefits conflict with previous appellate opinions mandating denial of either UC or WC benefits to persons serving criminal sentences in less than full confinement?

[255]*255(2) Did the Commonwealth Court improperly exempt Claimant from the incarceration disqualification under the [UC] Law by erroneously applying the holdings of this Court on house arrest in other contexts?

Chamberlain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 96 A.3d 987, 626 Pa. 254, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1731 (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

96 A.3d 987 (Chamberlain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.