Chamberlain v. Hall

11 Am. Tribal Law 395
CourtHo-Chunk Nation Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 2011
DocketNo. SU 10-03
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Am. Tribal Law 395 (Chamberlain v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chamberlain v. Hall, 11 Am. Tribal Law 395 (hochunk 2011).

Opinion

ORDER on DECISION

MARY JO HUNTER, Chief Justice.

This matter came before the Court on December 18, 2010 based upon the Appel-lee’s Reply Brief on December 10, 2010 by the Appellee Chamberlain. Associate Justice Joan Greendeer-Lee, Associate Justice Dennis Funmaker and Chief Justice Mary Jo Hunter reviewed the matter. The Court hereby ORDERS:

1.That this matter was incorrectly accepted for appeal because the Supreme Court understood that this was a final judgment. After seeking the information from the lower court, this Court was updated that the matter is indeed NOT at the stage of a final judgment despite the confusing language in the order. Therefore, the appeal request is denied at this time.

2. That the section of the Order (Motion Granted-In Pari) filed on July 30, 2010 ordering the sanction fees and costs assessed is stayed pursuant to Rule 68 of the HCN Rules of Civil Procedure pending the completion of this matter.

3. That further briefs should not be filed in this matter until and unless the case is appealed after a final judgment.

EGI HESKEKJET.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Am. Tribal Law 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chamberlain-v-hall-hochunk-2011.