Chamberlain v. Chamberlain
This text of 2 Aik. 232 (Chamberlain v. Chamberlain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Washington,
February, 1827.
Petitions for divorce will not be continued from Comity to county.
THIS was a petition for a bill of divorce. The Court having refused to grant the prayer of the petition, upon the testimony given on the hearing, Upham, for the petitioner, moved that the cause be continued to the next term, to be holden in another county, with the view to an opportunity of procuring further testimony.
The Court denied the motion, and said they had adopted the resolution, no longer to countenance the practice of transferring petitions for divorce from county to county.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Aik. 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chamberlain-v-chamberlain-vt-1827.