CHAMBERLAIN, GARY v. MODERN DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1309 CA 14-02058 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.
GARY CHAMBERLAIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
MAC TRAILER MANUFACTURING, INC., DEFENDANT, MODERN DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CUSTOM CANVAS MFG., CO., INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. -------------------------------------------------------- MODERN DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. AND MODERN LANDFILL, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
V
CHAMBERLAIN TRUCKING, LLC AND GARY CHAMBERLAIN, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
CARTAFALSA, SLATTERY, TURPIN & LEONOFF, BUFFALO (BRIAN P. MINEHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS- APPELLANTS.
BROWN CHIARI LLP, LANCASTER (BRADLEY D. MARBLE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
GIBSON, MCASKILL & CROSBY LLP, BUFFALO (C. CHRISTOPHER BRIDGE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered October 8, 2014. The order, among other things, denied the cross motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff Modern Disposal Service, Inc. and third-party plaintiff Modern Landfill, Inc. for summary judgment seeking to pierce the corporate veil.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on May 4, 2016,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
CHAMBERLAIN, GARY v. MODERN DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. (CHAMBERLAIN, GARY v. MODERN DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.