Chamber of Tourism of the Americas, Inc. v. Miss America Latina, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chamber of Tourism of the Americas, Inc. v. Miss America Latina, Inc.

469 So. 2d 932, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1327, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14300

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 28, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2156

StatusPublished

This text of 469 So. 2d 932 (Chamber of Tourism of the Americas, Inc. v. Miss America Latina, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chamber of Tourism of the Americas, Inc. v. Miss America Latina, Inc., 469 So. 2d 932, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1327, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14300 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Two corporate entities, both of which purport to promote beauty pageants, possess service marks that are remarkably similar. Appellant, Chamber of Tourism of the Americas, Inc. [Chamber of Tourism], registered the service marks “Miss Latin America” and “Señorita America Latina” with the office of the Secretary of State of Florida in June, 1980. In August, 1983, Miss America Latina, Inc., registered the service mark “Miss America Latina.” The Chamber of Tourism filed an action seeking injunctive relief based on the similarities in the service marks. Miss America Latina, Inc., filed a motion for summary judgment which the trial court granted.

The evidence relied upon to support the order does not resolve the two principal issues in this case — one, whether Chamber of Tourism is actually using its service marks and, two, whether the similarity of the service marks creates public confusion, see Stagg Shop of Miami, Inc. v. Moss, 120 So.2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)—therefore, summary judgment is precluded, see Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966), and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Two corporate entities, both of which purport to promote beauty pageants, possess service marks that are remarkably similar. Appellant, Chamber of Tourism of the Americas, Inc. [Chamber of Tourism], registered the service marks “Miss Latin America” and “Señorita America Latina” with the office of the Secretary of State of Florida in June, 1980. In August, 1983, Miss America Latina, Inc., registered the service mark “Miss America Latina.” The Chamber of Tourism filed an action seeking injunctive relief based on the similarities in the service marks. Miss America Latina, Inc., filed a motion for summary judgment which the trial court granted.

The evidence relied upon to support the order does not resolve the two principal issues in this case — one, whether Chamber of Tourism is actually using its service marks and, two, whether the similarity of the service marks creates public confusion, see Stagg Shop of Miami, Inc. v. Moss, 120 So.2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)—therefore, summary judgment is precluded, see Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966), and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

469 So. 2d 932, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1327, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chamber-of-tourism-of-the-americas-inc-v-miss-america-latina-inc-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack