CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF EASTERN UNION CTY. v. Leone

382 A.2d 381, 75 N.J. 319
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 27, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 382 A.2d 381 (CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF EASTERN UNION CTY. v. Leone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF EASTERN UNION CTY. v. Leone, 382 A.2d 381, 75 N.J. 319 (N.J. 1978).

Opinion

75 N.J. 319 (1978)
382 A.2d 381

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF EASTERN UNION COUNTY, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; THE ELIZABETH DAILY JOURNAL, A DIVISION OF MID-ATLANTIC NEWSPAPERS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; C. THOMAS THOMAS: JAMES M. McGOWAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
RICHARD LEONE, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; BRENDAN BYRNE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; F. JOSEPH CARRAGHER, ACTING SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY: S. HOWARD WOODSON, SPEAKER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY; FRANK J. DODD, PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-CROSS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 29, 1977.
Decided January 27, 1978.

Mr. John M. Boyle argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Sauer, Boyle, Dwyer and Canellis, attorneys; Mr. Boyle and Mr. William A. Cambria, on the brief).

Mr. Lawrence J. Marinari argued the cause for cross-appellants S. Howard Woodson and the New Jersey General Assembly (Messrs. Stockman, Marinari, Smithson and O'Donnell, attorneys; Ms. Maria Marinari Sypek, on the brief).

Mr. John P. Nulty argued the cause for cross-appellants Frank J. Dodd and the New Jersey State Senate (Messrs. Nulty and Hayden, attorneys).

Mr. Theodore A. Winard, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

*320 PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Chancery Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Masse v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, PUB. EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS.
432 A.2d 1339 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 A.2d 381, 75 N.J. 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chamber-of-commerce-of-eastern-union-cty-v-leone-nj-1978.