Chalom v. Panarelli
This text of 548 A.2d 1389 (Chalom v. Panarelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Superior Court (York County, Brodrick, J.) granting defendant an attachment on his counterclaim. We reject plaintiffs’ claim that the affidavits submitted in support of the attachment contained a defective jurat. Moreover, a thorough review of the pleadings and affidavits fails to demonstrate that defendant has virtually no chance of recovery on his counterclaim. Accordingly, we find no clear abuse of discretion on the part of the Superior Court. Herrick v. Theberge, 474 A.2d 870, 874 (Me.1984).
The entry is:
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 A.2d 1389, 1988 Me. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalom-v-panarelli-me-1988.