Chalmers v. Chalmers
3 P. 104, 2 Cal. Unrep. 277, 12 P.C.L.J. 104
This text of 3 P. 104 (Chalmers v. Chalmers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chalmers v. Chalmers, 3 P. 104, 2 Cal. Unrep. 277, 12 P.C.L.J. 104 (Cal. 1884).
Opinion
action is similar to that of Stockton Bldg. & L. Assn. v. Chalmers, 65 Cal. 93, 3 Pac. 101, except that this is to foreclose the junior mortgage. The court found that the plaintiff had no knowledge of the alleged rights of the interveners until the complaint in intervention was filed; and there is evidence sufficient to justify the finding.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stockton Building & Loan Ass'n v. Chalmers
3 P. 101 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 P. 104, 2 Cal. Unrep. 277, 12 P.C.L.J. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalmers-v-chalmers-cal-1884.