Chalmers v. Chalmers

3 P. 104, 2 Cal. Unrep. 277, 12 P.C.L.J. 104
California Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 1884·Published

Opinion

By the COURT.

action is similar to that of Stockton Bldg. & L. Assn. v. Chalmers, 65 Cal. 93, 3 Pac. 101, except that this is to foreclose the junior mortgage. The court found that the plaintiff had no knowledge of the alleged rights of the interveners until the complaint in intervention was filed; and there is evidence sufficient to justify the finding.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chalmers v. Chalmers, 3 P. 104, 2 Cal. Unrep. 277, 12 P.C.L.J. 104 (Cal. 1884).

3 P. 104 (Chalmers v. Chalmers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stockton Building & Loan Ass'n v. Chalmers
3 P. 101 (California Supreme Court, 1884)