Challiss v. Parker
This text of 11 Kan. 394 (Challiss v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is a controversy about a sidewalk tax. We fail to see anything in the record which places this case [398]*398outside the decision in Parker v. Challiss, 9 Kas., 155, and that in Challiss v. Parker, Treas., in which the opinion has just been filed, (supra, 384.) The 16th finding which contains the substance of this case simply aggregates all the points of objection to the validity of the proceedings presented in those cases. It is unnecessary therefore to enter anew into their consideration. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Kan. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/challiss-v-parker-kan-1873.