Challandes v. Shew

275 A.D.2d 369, 712 N.Y.S.2d 593, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8678

This text of 275 A.D.2d 369 (Challandes v. Shew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Challandes v. Shew, 275 A.D.2d 369, 712 N.Y.S.2d 593, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Village Manager of the Village of Ossining, dated December 31, 1998, which revoked the appointment of Joyce Challandes to the position of Data Entry Operator, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J.), entered May 6, 1999, which granted the petition and reinstated her to the position of Data Entry Operator with all back pay, salary, and other compensation which she would have received had her appointment not been revoked.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The documentary evidence overwhelmingly established that the Village Manager of Ossining appointed Joyce Challandes to the position of Data Entry Operator by an open, unequivocal act (see, People ex rel. Kresser v Fitzsimmons, 68 NY 514). Within one or two days of the appointment, Challandes was advised that she would be terminated. Pursuant to County of Westchester Civil Service Rule 11.1 (a) (1), once appointed, Challandes must serve a minimum of 12 weeks before she may be removed at the discretion of the appointing authority, unless, after a hearing, she is removed for incompetence or misconduct pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 (see, County of Westchester Civil Service Rule 11.7). Since there was no hearing, Challandes was removed in violation of the civil service [370]*370rules (see, Matter of Albano v Kirby, 36 NY2d 526). Accordingly, Challandes’ petition to be reinstated to the position of Data Entry Operator with back pay, salary, and other compensation was properly granted. Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Kresser v. . Fitzsimmons
68 N.Y. 514 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Albano v. Kirby
330 N.E.2d 615 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 369, 712 N.Y.S.2d 593, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/challandes-v-shew-nyappdiv-2000.