Chalk v. United States District Court Central District of California

832 F.2d 1158, 45 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 517
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 1987
DocketNo. 87-6418
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 832 F.2d 1158 (Chalk v. United States District Court Central District of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chalk v. United States District Court Central District of California, 832 F.2d 1158, 45 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 517 (9th Cir. 1987).

Opinions

ORDER

The order of the district court denying appellant Vincent L. Chalk’s motion for a preliminary injunction is reversed.

On this record, appellant has shown a strong likelihood of prevailing on the merits of his case. Evidence before the district court overwhelmingly indicates that the casual contact incident to the performance of his teaching duties in the classroom presents no significant risk of harm to others, and that although handicapped, because of AIDS, appellant is otherwise qualified to perform his job within the meaning of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, as amended. Preventing appellant from resuming his classroom occupation subjects him to irreparable injury.

Appellant has therefore met the requirements entitling him to a preliminary injunction. Zepeda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 753 F.2d 719, 727 (9th Cir.1983); Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Comm’n. v. National Football League, 634 F.2d 1197, 1200-01 (9th Cir.1980); see also Ray v. School District of DeSoto County, 666 F.Supp. 1524 (M.D.Fla.1987); Thomas v. Atascadero Unified School District, 662 F.Supp. 376, 381-82 (C.D.Cal.1987).

We therefore remand this action to the District Court for the Central District of California, with direction to enter a preliminary injunction ordering defendants forthwith to restore appellant to his former duties as a teacher of hearing-impaired chil[1159]*1159dren in the Orange County Department of Education.

A fuller opinion will follow.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
832 F.2d 1158, 45 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalk-v-united-states-district-court-central-district-of-california-ca9-1987.