Chalk v. Marcus Contracting Co.
This text of 253 A.D. 748 (Chalk v. Marcus Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by an infant plaintiff to recover damages for injuries sustained, and by his mother for expenses and loss of services, judgment in favor of plaintiffs reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion the verdicts are against the weight of the evidence. Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D. 748, 1 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalk-v-marcus-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1937.