Chalif v. Hanophy

277 A.D.2d 451, 715 N.Y.S.2d 891, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12334

This text of 277 A.D.2d 451 (Chalif v. Hanophy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chalif v. Hanophy, 277 A.D.2d 451, 715 N.Y.S.2d 891, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Robert J. Hanophy, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to dismiss a criminal action against the petitioner entitled People v Chalif, pending under Queens County Indictment No. 1265/98, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the proceeding and application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is,

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Ritter, J. P., Altman, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman
422 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 451, 715 N.Y.S.2d 891, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalif-v-hanophy-nyappdiv-2000.