Home/New York Court of Appeals/Chalfin v. Laniado

Chalfin v. Laniado

436 N.E.2d 1342, 56 N.Y.2d 736, 451 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3388
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 11, 1982
StatusPublished

This text of 436 N.E.2d 1342 (Chalfin v. Laniado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chalfin v. Laniado, 436 N.E.2d 1342, 56 N.Y.2d 736, 451 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3388 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

[737]*737Cross motion, insofar as it seeks an amendment of the notice of appeal, granted. Motion to dismiss appeal taken as of right granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, and cross motion insofar as it seeks leave to appeal dismissed, each upon the ground that the Appellate Division order granting a new trial, which is here sought to be reviewed, does not “necessarily affect” the final judgment as required by CPLR 5601 (subd [d]) and 5602 (subd [b], par 2, cl [ii]). (Long v Forest-Fehlhaber, 55 NY2d 154, 158; Miocic v Winters, 52 NY2d 896; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 79, p 344.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miocic v. Winters
418 N.E.2d 1325 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Long v. Forest-Fehlhaber
433 N.E.2d 115 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 N.E.2d 1342, 56 N.Y.2d 736, 451 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalfin-v-laniado-ny-1982.