Chalfant v. Rains

Supreme Court of Georgia

Chalfant v. Rains

262 S.E.2d 63, 244 Ga. 747, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1391

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 21, 1979

Docket35389

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 262 S.E.2d 63 (Chalfant v. Rains) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chalfant v. Rains, 262 S.E.2d 63, 244 Ga. 747, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1391 (Ga. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Justice.

The appellant in this case, Chalfant, is the former wife of the appellee Rains. Chalfant was granted a divorce from Rains in 1976 in South Carolina. Issues of alimony were not adjudicated since the South Carolina court lacked personal jurisdiction of the husband. In February 1979, Chalfant filed suit against Rains in Fulton County for alimony and for damages for breach of a marriage contract. In her complaint, she alleged that she is a resident of Illinois and that her former husband is a resident of Fulton County, Georgia. It is undisputed that [748]*748Rains was personally served while in Fulton County with a summons and complaint.

Submitted September 14, 1979 Decided November 21, 1979.

Rains filed a motion to dismiss the complaint "for want of jurisdiction over his person.” This motion was accompanied by an affidavit which stated that Rains is a resident of Colorado and not Georgia and was in Georgia for personal and business reasons. The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction was granted, and the case was dismissed. Chalfant appeals. We reverse.

Code Ann. § 15-202 provides: "The jurisdiction of this State and its laws extend to all persons while within its limits, whether as citizens, denizens, or temporary sojourners.” Rains was personally served in Fulton County. Although Rains may be a nonresident, service of process is sufficient to give the trial court personal jurisdiction. Code Ann. § 81A-104; McPherson v. McPherson, 238 Ga. 271 (232 SE2d 552 (1977); Padgett v. Penland, 230 Ga. 824 (199 SE2d 210) (1973).

In his brief on appeal, Rains argues that the trial court was correct in dismissing the suit because it had no jurisdiction of a claim for alimony filed by a nonresident plaintiff against a nonresident. defendant. This contention relates to subject matter jurisdiction, not personal jurisdiction. Hopkins v. Hopkins, 237 Ga. 845 (1) (229 SE2d 751) (1976). An alimony proceeding need not be ancillary to a divorce proceeding to be valid. The legislature has established a statutory residency requirement of six months before divorce proceedings can be brought, Code Ann. § 30-107, but has not extended this requirement to alimony proceedings.¹ We refuse to do so now.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan, J., who concurs in the judgment only. Scheer & Eisner, Robert A. Eisner, McClain, Mellen, Bowling & Hickman, Arthur Gregory, for appellant. A. Mims Wilkerson, Jr., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Justice.

The appellant in this case, Chalfant, is the former wife of the appellee Rains. Chalfant was granted a divorce from Rains in 1976 in South Carolina. Issues of alimony were not adjudicated since the South Carolina court lacked personal jurisdiction of the husband. In February 1979, Chalfant filed suit against Rains in Fulton County for alimony and for damages for breach of a marriage contract. In her complaint, she alleged that she is a resident of Illinois and that her former husband is a resident of Fulton County, Georgia. It is undisputed that [748]*748Rains was personally served while in Fulton County with a summons and complaint.

Submitted September 14, 1979 Decided November 21, 1979.

Rains filed a motion to dismiss the complaint "for want of jurisdiction over his person.” This motion was accompanied by an affidavit which stated that Rains is a resident of Colorado and not Georgia and was in Georgia for personal and business reasons. The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction was granted, and the case was dismissed. Chalfant appeals. We reverse.

Code Ann. § 15-202 provides: "The jurisdiction of this State and its laws extend to all persons while within its limits, whether as citizens, denizens, or temporary sojourners.” Rains was personally served in Fulton County. Although Rains may be a nonresident, service of process is sufficient to give the trial court personal jurisdiction. Code Ann. § 81A-104; McPherson v. McPherson, 238 Ga. 271 (232 SE2d 552 (1977); Padgett v. Penland, 230 Ga. 824 (199 SE2d 210) (1973).

In his brief on appeal, Rains argues that the trial court was correct in dismissing the suit because it had no jurisdiction of a claim for alimony filed by a nonresident plaintiff against a nonresident. defendant. This contention relates to subject matter jurisdiction, not personal jurisdiction. Hopkins v. Hopkins, 237 Ga. 845 (1) (229 SE2d 751) (1976). An alimony proceeding need not be ancillary to a divorce proceeding to be valid. The legislature has established a statutory residency requirement of six months before divorce proceedings can be brought, Code Ann. § 30-107, but has not extended this requirement to alimony proceedings.¹ We refuse to do so now.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan, J., who concurs in the judgment only. Scheer & Eisner, Robert A. Eisner, McClain, Mellen, Bowling & Hickman, Arthur Gregory, for appellant. A. Mims Wilkerson, Jr., for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 S.E.2d 63, 244 Ga. 747, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalfant-v-rains-ga-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack