Chalfant v. O'Toole

80 F.2d 1007, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 164, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3433
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 1935
DocketNo. 5874
StatusPublished

This text of 80 F.2d 1007 (Chalfant v. O'Toole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chalfant v. O'Toole, 80 F.2d 1007, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 164, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3433 (3d Cir. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts and questions involved in this case are stated in the opinion of the court below. 12 F.Supp. 17.

After argument and full consideration had we find ourselves in accord therewith, and the decree below is affirmed on such opinion, adding thereto the later decided case of Supreme Permanent B. & L. Association v. Milbourne, Sec. 1835, Vol. 1, Prentice-Hall (1935).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chalfant v. O'Toole
12 F. Supp. 17 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F.2d 1007, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 164, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalfant-v-otoole-ca3-1935.