Chalasani v. Elia
This text of Chalasani v. Elia (Chalasani v. Elia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------x
PRASAD CHALASANI,
Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 22-CV-00794(EK)(LB)
-against-
MARYELLEN ELIA, COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, AND STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT COMMITTEE ON THE PROFESSIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
------------------------------------x ERIC KOMITEE, United States District Judge: Judge Bloom issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending, for a variety of reasons, that I grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss Prasad Chalasani’s complaint.1 ECF No. 27. I adopt the recommendations that Chalasani’s Section 1983 due process claims be dismissed because they are time- barred and fail adequately to allege insufficient process. Chalasani’s objections to these conclusions are without merit for the reasons Judge Bloom sets forth. Having so concluded, I
1 The defendants are the former Commissioner of the New York State Education Department Education, MaryEllen Elia; the former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Mary T. Bassett; the former DOH Commissioner, Howard Zucker; the former Director of the Office of Professional Medical Conduct, Keith Servis; and Governor Kathy Hochul. They are named in their personal and official capacities. do not reach the recommended alternative grounds for dismissal of the due process claims. The Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act of 1974
claims, too, are dismissed, for the reasons stated in the R&R. The R&R’s Rooker-Feldman recommendation need not be addressed before the merits. See Butcher v. Wendt, 975 F.3d 236, 244 (2d Cir. 2020). The same is true for sufficiency of service, United States v. Vazquez, 145 F.3d 74, 80 n.3 (2d Cir. 1998), and for Eleventh Amendment immunity. Springfield Hosp., Inc. v. Guzman, 28 F.4th 403, 417 n.18 (2d Cir. 2022). Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in part. The defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is granted. Leave to amend is denied, for the reasons stated in the R&R. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for the defendants and close this case.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eric Komitee__________ ERIC KOMITEE United States District Judge
Dated: December 7, 2023 Brooklyn, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chalasani v. Elia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalasani-v-elia-nyed-2023.