Chaitin v. Board of Regents of the University of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chaitin v. Board of Regents of the University of New York

277 A.D.2d 921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 921 (Chaitin v. Board of Regents of the University of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chaitin v. Board of Regents of the University of New York, 277 A.D.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York censoring and reprimanding petitioner. Petitioner is an osteopathic physician duly licensed to practice medicine in the State of New York. He was charged and found guilty of fraud or deceit in the practice of medicine and of advertising for patronage by means of a printed pamphlet. The evidence supports the findings. Motion to dismiss the proceeding denied. Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Brewster, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See post, p. 954.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York censoring and reprimanding petitioner. Petitioner is an osteopathic physician duly licensed to practice medicine in the State of New York. He was charged and found guilty of fraud or deceit in the practice of medicine and of advertising for patronage by means of a printed pamphlet. The evidence supports the findings. Motion to dismiss the proceeding denied. Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Brewster, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See post, p. 954.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaitin-v-board-of-regents-of-the-university-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1950.