Chairty Lane Furr v. State of Florida
This text of Chairty Lane Furr v. State of Florida (Chairty Lane Furr v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
CHAIRTY LANE FURR,
Appellant,
v. CASE NO. 1D14-0308
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed March 20, 2017.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Liberty County. Jonathan E. Sjostrom, Judge.
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Mark V. Murray, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
PER CURIAM.
We originally reversed the appellant’s conviction for manslaughter with a
firearm based on this Court’s decision in Floyd v. State, 151 So. 3d 452 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2014) (Floyd I). Thereafter, the Florida Supreme Court quashed our opinion in Floyd I and remanded for reconsideration upon application of its decision in State
v. Floyd, 186 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. 2016) (Floyd II).
Applying Floyd II, we find that the jury instructions given in the instant case
did not amount to fundamental error. Although we did not previously address it, we
also reject the appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The appellant’s
judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chairty Lane Furr v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chairty-lane-furr-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.