Chairman v. . Clark

11 N.C. 43
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 5, 1825·Published

Opinion

This case presents the precise question that was made in McKellar v.Bowell, ante, 34. In that case the Superior Court rejected the evidence properly; in this case it was erroneously admitted. The judgment here must consequently be

Reversed.

Cited: Armistead v. Harramond, post, 341; Governor v. Carter,25 N.C. 341; Brown v. Pike, 74 N.C. 534; Moore v. Alexander,96 N.C. 36.

(44)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chairman v. . Clark, 11 N.C. 43 (N.C. 1825).

11 N.C. 43 (Chairman v. . Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. . Alexander
1 S.E. 536 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1887)
Governor Ex Rel. McElroy v. Carter
25 N.C. 338 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1843)