Chailland, Inc. v. Chaisson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Chailland, Inc. v. Chaisson

869 So. 2d 803, 2004 La. LEXIS 753, 2004 WL 765954

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 12, 2004·No. No. 2003-CC-3526·Published

Opinion

In re Chailland, Inc.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 594-785; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-C-1354.

Granted. Because relator’s application to the court of appeal was filed within the deadline as extended by the trial court, the court of appeal erred in declining to consider the application. See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Chailland, Inc.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 594-785; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-C-1354.

Granted. Because relator’s application to the court of appeal was filed within the deadline as extended by the trial court, the court of appeal erred in declining to consider the application. See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Chailland, Inc. v. Chaisson, 869 So. 2d 803, 2004 La. LEXIS 753, 2004 WL 765954 (La. 2004).

Pincite

869 So. 2d 803 (Chailland, Inc. v. Chaisson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related