Chailla, O. & F., Pets v. Verizon of Pa.
This text of Chailla, O. & F., Pets v. Verizon of Pa. (Chailla, O. & F., Pets v. Verizon of Pa.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
OPTATUS AND FLORENCE CHAILLA, : No. 86 MAL 2021 : Petitioners : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : VERIZON OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and
the “Supersedes Stay Motion” are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chailla, O. & F., Pets v. Verizon of Pa., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chailla-o-f-pets-v-verizon-of-pa-pa-2021.