Chahal v. Credit Suisse Group AG
Opinion
aca] DOCUMENT □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:. : ----------------------------------------------------------------- DATE FILED: __ 3/10/2023 - SET CAPITAL LLC, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, 18-CV-02268 (AT)(SN) -against- ORDER CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG, CREDIT SUISSE AG, CREDIT SUISSE INTERNATIONAL, TIDJANE THIAM, DAVID R. MATHERS, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC, JANUS INDEX & CALCULATION SERVICES LLC, and JANUS DISTRIBUTORS LLC d/b/a/ JANUS HENDERSON DISTRIBUTORS, Defendants. □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ +--+ +--+ -----------X SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: Upon review of the parties’ and non-party Cboe’s letters at ECF Nos. 242, 248, 255, and 256, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have satisfied the low threshold for relevance set out in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). This is particularly true in light of our judicial system’s well-established preference for full and complete discovery. In addition, Cboe has asserted no privilege that would justify non-disclosure of the market participants’ identities sought by Plaintiffs, and while the “right of access to discovery materials is frequently qualified in the interest of protecting legitimate interests,”” the privacy interests identified by Cboe are substantially mitigated or entirely addressed by the staleness of
1 See S.E.C. v. Rajaratnam, 622 F.3d 159, 180-81 (2d Cir. 2010) (“The ‘fundamental maxim of discovery [is] that mutual knowledge of all the relevant facts gathered by both parties is essential to proper litigation.”” (quoting Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. U.S. Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of Towa, 482 U.S. 522, 540 n. 25 (1987))). 27d. at 181.
the transactions at issue, the fact that XIV no longer exists, and the parties’ protective order. See ECF No. 197. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion to compel Cboe’s production of the identities of market participants identified in ECF No. 242 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the gavel at ECF No. 242. SO ORDERED.
satan NETBURN United States Magistrate Judge DATED: March 10, 2023 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chahal v. Credit Suisse Group AG (Chahal v. Credit Suisse Group AG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.