Chafin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Fourth Circuit

Chafin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

98 F. App'x 250

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 2004

DocketNo. 04-1033

StatusPublished

This text of 98 F. App'x 250 (Chafin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chafin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 98 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Patricia S. Chafin appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Chafin v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., No. CA-03-153-2 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Patricia S. Chafin appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Chafin v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., No. CA-03-153-2 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 F. App'x 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chafin-v-state-farm-fire-casualty-co-ca4-2004.