Chaffins v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail-Abingdon

Fourth Circuit

Chaffins v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail-Abingdon

465 F. App'x 287

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2012·No. No. 11-7145·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy Dean Chaffins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chaffins v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail, No. 7:11-cv-00312-JCT (W.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2011). Chaffins’ request for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy Dean Chaffins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chaffins v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail, No. 7:11-cv-00312-JCT (W.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2011). Chaffins’ request for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Chaffins v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail-Abingdon, 465 F. App'x 287 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

465 F. App'x 287 (Chaffins v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail-Abingdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related