Chaffee v. Garrett

6 Ohio 421
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1834
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Ohio 421 (Chaffee v. Garrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chaffee v. Garrett, 6 Ohio 421 (Ohio 1834).

Opinion

Judge Lane

delivered the opinion of the court:

The facts agreed, show clearly that the note, the amount of which the plaintiff seeks to recover, was given in consideration of the lease. The title of the lessor to the premises leased, is derived under the will of Isaac Walker, who derived a possessory title, by succession to his father, one of the Wyandot tribe of Indians, the lands lying within their reservation.

The statute of the United States, of 1802, enacts that no purchase, lease, conveyance, or title of, or to land from, an Indian, shall have any validity, unless made in a treaty with the United States. The lease, therefore, transferred no title, because the lessors possessed no title to transfer; consequently, the consideration of the note fails, and the plaintiff can not recover.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ohio 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaffee-v-garrett-ohio-1834.