Chaffee v. Garrett

6 Ohio 421
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1834·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judge Lane

delivered the opinion of the court:

The facts agreed, show clearly that the note, the amount of which the plaintiff seeks to recover, was given in consideration of the lease. The title of the lessor to the premises leased, is derived under the will of Isaac Walker, who derived a possessory title, by succession to his father, one of the Wyandot tribe of Indians, the lands lying within their reservation.

The statute of the United States, of 1802, enacts that no purchase, lease, conveyance, or title of, or to land from, an Indian, shall have any validity, unless made in a treaty with the United States. The lease, therefore, transferred no title, because the lessors possessed no title to transfer; consequently, the consideration of the note fails, and the plaintiff can not recover.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chaffee v. Garrett, 6 Ohio 421 (Ohio 1834).

6 Ohio 421 (Chaffee v. Garrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related