Chafer v. Chafer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chafer v. Chafer

235 A.D. 659

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 659 (Chafer v. Chafer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chafer v. Chafer, 235 A.D. 659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree so far as appealed from reversed on the law, with costs to the appeEant, payable out of the estate and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for further proceedings on the ground that the law does not authorize a guardian to institute a discovery proceeding under the circumstances shown in this record (Surr. Ct. Act, § 205)* and that the record discloses nothing which authorized the surrogate to require the executor to give a bond. (Surr. Ct. Act, §§ 94-97.) AE concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree so far as appealed from reversed on the law, with costs to the appeEant, payable out of the estate and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for further proceedings on the ground that the law does not authorize a guardian to institute a discovery proceeding under the circumstances shown in this record (Surr. Ct. Act, § 205)* and that the record discloses nothing which authorized the surrogate to require the executor to give a bond. (Surr. Ct. Act, §§ 94-97.) AE concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chafer-v-chafer-nyappdiv-1932.