Chafee v. Sprague

13 A. 121, 16 R.I. 189, 1888 R.I. LEXIS 23
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 18, 1888·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Although the bill prays for the specific performance of a contract relating to personal property, for breach of which there is ordinarily an adequate remedy at law, the court is of opinion that, as the property in question was contracted to a trustee in aid and enforcement of the provisions of a trust mortgage, a court of equity has jurisdiction of the subject matter of the bill. The stock in question was to be transferred upon request; but no request was made upon the intestate during her lifetime. As against a solvent estate, we think this would not render the bill demurrable; and as we construe the bill, no specific allegation of insolvency appears.

Demurrer overruled. *Page 191

The case then came on for hearing on bill, answer, and proofs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chafee v. Sprague, 13 A. 121, 16 R.I. 189, 1888 R.I. LEXIS 23 (R.I. 1888).

13 A. 121 (Chafee v. Sprague) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

General Securities Corporation v. Welton
135 So. 329 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)