Chadwick v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chadwick v. Ward

53 A.D.2d 1003, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 29, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 1003 (Chadwick v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chadwick v. Ward, 53 A.D.2d 1003, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 3, 1976 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to secure his release to parole supervision. While petitioner was entitled to a prompt final revocation hearing (People ex rel. Schmidt v La Vallee, 39 NY2d 886), he has at this point in time received such a hearing. Therefore, this appeal should be dismissed as moot, particularly since there is no showing that the delay resulted in any prejudice. Appeal dismissed, as moot, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Mahoney, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 3, 1976 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to secure his release to parole supervision. While petitioner was entitled to a prompt final revocation hearing (People ex rel. Schmidt v La Vallee, 39 NY2d 886), he has at this point in time received such a hearing. Therefore, this appeal should be dismissed as moot, particularly since there is no showing that the delay resulted in any prejudice. Appeal dismissed, as moot, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Mahoney, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 1003, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chadwick-v-ward-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack