Chadwick v. Waldorf Steam Laundry Co.

54 Misc. 618, 104 N.Y.S. 746
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 15, 1907·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The answer of defendant, a domestic corporation, was verified by the attorney and the court below struck it out and gave judgment for plaintiff upon the complaint on the ground that section 164 of the Municipal Court Act required such verification of pleadings to be made by an officer of the corporation. Climax Spec. Co. v. Smith & Sons, 31 Misc. Rep. 275, a decision of this court, is a direct authority to the contrary.

Present: Gildersleeve, Fitzgerald, and Goff, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chadwick v. Waldorf Steam Laundry Co., 54 Misc. 618, 104 N.Y.S. 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

54 Misc. 618 (Chadwick v. Waldorf Steam Laundry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Climax Specialty Co. v. Benjamin C. Smith & Sons
31 Misc. 275 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)