Chadwick v. United States

170 F.2d 986
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 7, 1948
DocketNo. 12430
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 170 F.2d 986 (Chadwick v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chadwick v. United States, 170 F.2d 986 (5th Cir. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On February 3, 1947, appellant, having had the assistance of able counsel to advise and consult with him, pleaded guilty to charges of having broken into a building used as a post office, and, acting jointly and severally with others, stole certain property of the United States. Sentenced to serve three years in the penitentiary, he entered upon the service of his sentence. On April 9, 1948, he filed a motion for leave to file and docket motion to vacate judgment and sentence, the grounds being that he had been held in secret seclusion by officers of the government as a prisoner from- July 28, 1946, until August 2, 1946, and as a result thereof a confession was then secured from him.

The district judge, of the opinion that as a matter of law it did not state sufficient grounds upon which the court could take the action prayed for in it, denied the motion.

We think it clear that the judge was right. The sentence he is serving was based not upon the confession of which he complains but upon his plea of guilty voluntarily made with the assistance, and upon the advice, of his counsel many months after the purported confession was made.

The judgment appealed from was right. It is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Herman
219 A.2d 413 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1966)
Robert Sanchez Suarez v. United States
333 F.2d 366 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
United States v. Gerald Joseph Koptik
300 F.2d 19 (Seventh Circuit, 1962)
Hardy v. United States
159 F. Supp. 208 (S.D. New York, 1957)
United States v. Angelico
145 F. Supp. 292 (S.D. New York, 1956)
United States ex rel. Kranz v. Humphrey
174 F.2d 741 (Third Circuit, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 F.2d 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chadwick-v-united-states-ca5-1948.