Chadwick v. Norfolk-Southern Railway Co.

75 S.E. 852, 161 N.C. 209, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 392
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 25, 1912·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee. Curiam.

The plaintiff moves to dismiss this appeal in this Court upon the ground that the same is premature. The clerk of the Superior Court dismissed the proceedings.

*210 Upon appeal at chambers,, the judge presiding in tbe Third Judicial District reversed the. judgment of the clerk and remanded the same to him, to the end that the proper order be made of survey, etc., in accordance with the statute. Revisal, 326.

We are of opinion that the motion to dismiss this appeal because it is premature should be allowed. It was the duty of the defendant to have noted every exception and let the cause proceed to the hearing under the statute, and then, if dissatisfied with the final result, upon exceptions properly taken, the cause can be heard in the Superior Court, and thence by appeal to this Court.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chadwick v. Norfolk-Southern Railway Co., 75 S.E. 852, 161 N.C. 209, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 392 (N.C. 1912).

75 S.E. 852 (Chadwick v. Norfolk-Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission v. Cannon Manufacturing Co.
116 S.E. 178 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. Phillips
109 S.E. 257 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
Williams v. Bailey
177 N.C. 37 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)