Chadwick v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chadwick v. City of New York

275 A.D.2d 945

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 945 (Chadwick v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chadwick v. City of New York, 275 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

No opinion. Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and MacCrate, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and judgment and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: A question of fact as to defendant’s negligence was presented which should have been submitted to the jury for their determination. (Woloszynowski v. New York Central R. R. Co., 254 N. Y. 206; Bragg v. Central New England Ry. Co., 228 N. Y. 54.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No opinion. Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and MacCrate, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and judgment and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: A question of fact as to defendant’s negligence was presented which should have been submitted to the jury for their determination. (Woloszynowski v. New York Central R. R. Co., 254 N. Y. 206; Bragg v. Central New England Ry. Co., 228 N. Y. 54.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chadwick-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack