Chadwick v. City of New York
275 A.D.2d 945
Opinion
No opinion. Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and MacCrate, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and judgment and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: A question of fact as to defendant’s negligence was presented which should have been submitted to the jury for their determination. (Woloszynowski v. New York Central R. R. Co., 254 N. Y. 206; Bragg v. Central New England Ry. Co., 228 N. Y. 54.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chadwick v. City of New York, 275 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
275 A.D.2d 945 (Chadwick v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bragg v. Central New England Railway Co.
126 N.E. 253 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Woloszynowski v. New York Central Railroad
254 N.Y. 206 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)