Chadwick-El v. Titus

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6121

STEVE CARL CHADWICK-EL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROGER W. TITUS, U.S. District Court Judge, MD,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-02662-RDB)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Carl Chadwick-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steve Carl Chadwick-El appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Chadwick-El v. Titus, No.

1:09-cv-02662-RDB (D. Md. filed Nov. 4, 2009; entered Nov. 5,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED