Chadwick-El v. Connor

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chadwick-El v. Connor. Read the opinion of the Court — 390 F. App'x 234
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2010·No. 10-6339·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6339

STEVE CARL CHADWICK-EL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA S. CONNOR, U.S. Court Clerk,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-03331-RDB)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 5, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Carl Chadwick-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steve Carl Chadwick-El appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Chadwick-El v. Connor, No. 1:09-cv-03331-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 7,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chadwick-El v. Connor, (4th Cir. 2010).

Chadwick-El v. Connor (Chadwick-El v. Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related