Chadwick Benjamin A/K/A Chad Anthony Benjamin v. State
This text of Chadwick Benjamin A/K/A Chad Anthony Benjamin v. State (Chadwick Benjamin A/K/A Chad Anthony Benjamin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State of TexasAppellee/s
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 16, 2014
No. 04-12-00500-CR
Chadwick Benjamin a/k/a Chad Anthony BENJAMIN, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 396th District Court, Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1239333D The Honorable George William Gallagher, Judge Presiding
O R D E R
On September 25, 2013, this court issued an opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment. Appellant thereafter filed a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals. On March 12, 2014, the Court of Criminal Appeals refused appellant’s petition for discretionary review. The mandate issued on April 10, 2014. On April 14, 2014, appellant filed a pro se motion in this court requesting access to, or a free copy of, the appellate record for purposes of appealing the refusal of his petition for discretionary review.
An indigent appellant’s right to obtain a free copy of the appellate record in connection with an initial direct appeal does not extend to discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2; Ex parte Trainer, 181 S.W.3d 358, 358-59 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). The Court of Criminal Appeals has held that even though an appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review, there is no constitutional or statutory requirement that the record be provided to appellant at no cost for purposes of preparing and filing a pro se petition for discretionary review. Trainer, 181 S.W.3d at 359. This principle extends to the filing of a pro se motion for rehearing of the refusal of a petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 79. Under Trainer, we have no choice but to deny appellant=s motion. Accordingly, appellant=s motion is DENIED.
_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of April, 2014.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chadwick Benjamin A/K/A Chad Anthony Benjamin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chadwick-benjamin-aka-chad-anthony-benjamin-v-stat-texapp-2014.