Chadwell v. State
241 S.W. 1119, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 974, 1922 WL 2731
Opinion
The conviction is for
vagrancy. No statement of facts or bills of exceptions are furnished, and we have discerned no fundamental error. (The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chadwell v. State, 241 S.W. 1119, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 974, 1922 WL 2731 (Tex. 1922).
241 S.W. 1119 (Chadwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.