Chad Walker v. Julie Walker

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 29, 2025
Docket3D2025-1404
StatusPublished

This text of Chad Walker v. Julie Walker (Chad Walker v. Julie Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chad Walker v. Julie Walker, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 29, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Nos. 3D24-2013, 3D25-1404 Lower Tribunal No. 18-DR-111-M

Chad Walker, Appellant,

vs.

Julie Walker, Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Bonnie J. Helms, Judge.

Alexander Appellate Law P.A., and Samuel Alexander and Michael J. Ellis (Jacksonville), for appellant.

Allison Rub, P.A., and Allison Rub; Jason M. Wandner, P.A., and Jason M. Wandner, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ballantyne v. Ballantyne, 666 So. 2d 957, 958 (Fla. 1st

DCA 1996) (holding a marital settlement agreement should not be disturbed

unless it is “found to be ambiguous or in need of clarification, modification,

or interpretation”); Kipp v. Kipp, 844 So. 2d 691, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)

(“[A] court must construe a contract in a manner that accords with reason

and probability; and avoid an absurd construction.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ballantyne v. Ballantyne
666 So. 2d 957 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Kipp v. Kipp
844 So. 2d 691 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chad Walker v. Julie Walker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chad-walker-v-julie-walker-fladistctapp-2025.