Chad Walker v. Julie Walker

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 29, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Nos. 3D24-2013, 3D25-1404 Lower Tribunal No. 18-DR-111-M

Chad Walker, Appellant,

vs.

Julie Walker, Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Bonnie J. Helms, Judge.

Alexander Appellate Law P.A., and Samuel Alexander and Michael J. Ellis (Jacksonville), for appellant.

Allison Rub, P.A., and Allison Rub; Jason M. Wandner, P.A., and Jason M. Wandner, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ballantyne v. Ballantyne, 666 So. 2d 957, 958 (Fla. 1st

DCA 1996) (holding a marital settlement agreement should not be disturbed

unless it is “found to be ambiguous or in need of clarification, modification,

or interpretation”); Kipp v. Kipp, 844 So. 2d 691, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)

(“[A] court must construe a contract in a manner that accords with reason

and probability; and avoid an absurd construction.”).