Chad Michael Rager v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 2019·No. 18-1681·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-1681

CHAD MICHAEL RAGER, Petitioner, v.

MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 13, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Chad Michael Rager, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chad Michael Rager v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Chad Michael Rager v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Chad Michael Rager v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.