Chad Michael Rager v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
This text of Chad Michael Rager v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Chad Michael Rager v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-1681 _____________________________
CHAD MICHAEL RAGER,
Petitioner,
v.
MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
September 13, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.
LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Chad Michael Rager, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chad Michael Rager v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chad-michael-rager-v-mark-s-inch-secretary-florida-department-of-fladistctapp-2019.