Chad Kenyatta Leigh v. CT Corporation System, et al.

• Court: District Court, D. Kansas
• Decided: November 13, 2025
• Docket: 6:25-cv-01247
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

CHAD KENYATTA LEIGH,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 25-1247-TC-BGS

CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, et al.,

Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees filed by Plaintiff Chad Kenyatta Leigh, who is representing himself pro se. (Doc. 3, sealed.) The motion requests leave for Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP motion”). (Id.) Plaintiff also contemporaneously filed the requisite financial affidavit in support of his motion. (Doc. 3-1, sealed.) Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), a federal court may authorize commencement of a civil action “without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit that … the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” To succeed on an IFP motion, “the movant must show a financial inability to pay the required filing fees.” Lister v. Dep’t of Treasury, 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005). Proceeding IFP “in a civil case is a privilege, not a right – fundamental or otherwise.” White v. Colorado, 157 F.3d 1226, 1233 (10th Cir. 1998). The decision to grant or deny IFP status under § 1915 lies within the district court’s sound discretion. Engberg v. Wyoming, 265 F.3d 1109, 1122 (10th Cir. 2001). Based on the financial information provided by Plaintiff in his affidavit of financial status (Doc. 3-1, sealed), the Court finds that Plaintiff has shown an inability to pay the filing fee. Thus, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to proceed without prepayment of fees (Doc. 3). That stated, because of issues identified in Plaintiff’s Complaint, as discussed in the Court’s contemporaneously- filed Show Cause Order, the Clerk’s office shall not proceed to issue summons in this case at this time. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees (Doc. 3, sealed) is GRANTED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), Plaintiff may commence this action without prepayment of fees. The Clerk’s office shall not proceed to issue

summons in this case at this time absent further Order from the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated November 13, 2025, at Wichita, Kansas. /S/BROOKS G. SEVERSON Brooks G. Severson United States Magistrate Judge