Chad J Theodore v. Krysta Livingston
This text of Chad J Theodore v. Krysta Livingston (Chad J Theodore v. Krysta Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 25, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
146806 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra CHAD J. THEODORE, Bridget M. McCormack Plaintiff-Appellee, David F. Viviano, Justices v SC: 146806 COA: 306555 Genesee CC: 10-094902-NI KRYSTA LIVINGSTON, Defendant-Appellee, and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and PROGRESSIVE MARATHON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.
____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 25, 2013 p0918 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chad J Theodore v. Krysta Livingston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chad-j-theodore-v-krysta-livingston-mich-2013.